Search
5 resources
-
Tamara Tate, Shayan Doroudi, Daniel Ritc...|Jan 10th, 2023|preprintTamara Tate, Shayan Doroudi, Daniel Ritc...Jan 10th, 2023
The public release and surprising capacity of ChatGPT has brought AI-enabled text generation into the forefront for educators and academics. ChatGPT and similar text generation tools raise numerous questions for educational practitioners, policymakers, and researchers. We begin by first describing what large language models are and how they function, and then situate them in the history of technology’s complex interrelationship with literacy, cognition, and education. Finally, we discuss implications for the field.
-
Tamara Tate, Jacob Steiss, Drew Bailey|Dec 5th, 2023|preprintTamara Tate, Jacob Steiss, Drew BaileyDec 5th, 2023
Researchers have sought for decades to automate holistic essay scoring. Over the years, these programs have improved significantly. However, accuracy requires significant amounts of training on human-scored texts—reducing the expediency and usefulness of such programs for routine uses by teachers across the nation on non-standardized prompts. This study analyzes the output of multiple versions of ChatGPT scoring of secondary student essays from three extant corpora and compares it to quality...
-
Jacob Steiss, Tamara Tate, Steve Graham,...|Sep 7th, 2023|preprintJacob Steiss, Tamara Tate, Steve Graham,...Sep 7th, 2023
Offering students formative feedback on drafts of their writing is an effective way to facilitate writing development. This study examined the ability of generative AI (i.e., ChatGPT) to provide formative feedback on students’ compositions. We compared the quality of human and AI feedback by scoring the feedback each provided on secondary student essays (n=200) on five measures of feedback quality: the degree to which feedback (a) was criteria-based, (b) provided clear directions for...
-
Jacob Steiss, Tamara Tate, Steve Graham,...|Sep 7th, 2023|preprintJacob Steiss, Tamara Tate, Steve Graham,...Sep 7th, 2023
Offering students formative feedback on drafts of their writing is an effective way to facilitate writing development. This study examined the ability of generative AI (i.e., ChatGPT) to provide formative feedback on students’ compositions. We compared the quality of human and AI feedback by scoring the feedback each provided on secondary student essays (n=200) on five measures of feedback quality: the degree to which feedback (a) was criteria-based, (b) provided clear directions for...
-
Jacob Steiss, Tamara Tate, Steve Graham,...|Jun 27th, 2024|journalArticleJacob Steiss, Tamara Tate, Steve Graham,...Jun 27th, 2024
Structured Abstract Background Offering students formative feedback on their writing is an effective way to facilitate writing development. Recent advances in AI (i.e., ChatGPT) may function as an automated writing evaluation tool, increasing the amount of feedback students receive and diminishing the burden on teachers to provide frequent feedback to large classes. Aims We examined the ability of generative AI (ChatGPT) to provide formative feedback. We compared the quality of human and AI...