Complementary strengths? Evaluation of a hybrid human-machine scoring approach for a test of oral academic English

Article Status
Published
Authors/contributors
Title
Complementary strengths? Evaluation of a hybrid human-machine scoring approach for a test of oral academic English
Publication
Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
Date
2021-7-4
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
437-455
Journal Abbr
Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
Citation Key
davis2021a
Accessed
10/03/2023, 23:05
ISSN
0969-594X
Short Title
Complementary strengths?
Language
en
Library Catalogue
DOI.org (Crossref)
Extra
<标题>: 互补优势?针对学术英语口语测试的混合人机评分方法评估 <AI Smry>: An empirical study that explored the possibility of combining human and machine scores using responses from the speaking section of the TOEFL iBT® test found that composite scores calculated solely from human analytic scores showed the highest reliability and reliability steadily decreased as more machine scores replaced human scores. Read_Status: New Read_Status_Date: 2026-01-26T11:33:38.513Z
Citation
Davis, L., & Papageorgiou, S. (2021). Complementary strengths? Evaluation of a hybrid human-machine scoring approach for a test of oral academic English. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(4), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1979466
Powered by Zotero and Kerko.